questions.
These questions were asked by many in the past. Here I simply accumulated. And pushed me to this article. ... On these issues in one form or another the answers, but they are not satisfactory.
Why spend money on the construction site? . dollars from the Fund ( 2/3 of all the money allocated to the fund ) and has the same number of partners. Huge anything equal, that could be used to finance start-ups. And, if it really itching to do it, then place the fund in any existing city with established infrastructure.
Why would require ...
Why would require the presence of a foreign expert?.
What is the roster of the fund? .
Why is so little heard of a real project funding? . ) Of the 57 projects, only 17 indicated the amount of funding ( in my memory, two projects awarded grants, and is passed through news feeds ). Do all of the 17 alleged received funding? . On the one hand, problems with money, there are many investors and the fund then one of the many. On the other hand, he does not pretend to share in the project, t. to. distributes grants and m. e. his money is less expensive project than the money of other investors. If you look at the market, the participants very well do without the cheap ... Obviously, this low price, or imaginary, or it is not a key factor for project.
The last question is related to the original reference. At the last Rife was a time. One of the leading zaohal about taxes, they say high. In response, dear people, business owners hissed at him: ... ... e. , About the tax benefits fund ...
It is not fair. The benefits of these state-owned. Fund any expenses shall not be here (do not fund, and the state does not doschityvaetsya money in the treasury from providing these benefits). Moreover, it is doubtful legality of this action. Think about it: a private individual, not a civil servant, who decides to grant exemptions from the state. This is a direct privatization of state functions, is not it?.
It is of little interest to business: the benefits do not solve the pressing problems of the business, while in return commit to move to Skolkovo, to pay a foreign specialist.
Thus, the fund business is not very important and valuable: at the market a lot of money in addition to fund and tax credits, this is not the biggest headache of the entrepreneur. Here, with the result, and we get such stories as the ... link in first paragraph ) is not profitable to deal with the fund.
Recently in the newspaper read that lawmakers want to reduce the social security tax, and remove incentives for Skolkovo. This position is clear, the benefits are of little interest for them and do not people go to Skolkovo. But relief is a great way to avoid taxes by large firms. For example, I read a piece of news is not that our oil transferred back its IT division. What they do there, then?.
These are now ... And all this takes place in complete silence, try to get at least some discussion on one of these issues. In the closed fund, many complain, for example here:. ... Or read the official press releases about the fund falls to the server, this all - separate ...
myths.
Disintegrating road to Skolkovo NO relationship to the fund ...
The Business School ... Accordingly, it mod, a beautiful building in which the President likes to speak with any side fund ...
Site Fund is a normal web site, for which money is paid a modest. To date, the site carries a modest role cards fund, and no more. So what he fell, says nothing about ... n. amateurish conclusions.
PS.
Once again, these questions are not only mine, to ask and discuss the many people at various stages of discussion.
No comments:
Post a Comment